USA v. Ruben Sosa-Balderama, No. 12-20442 (5th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 12-20442 Document: 00512277947 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 12-20442 Conference Calendar June 18, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RUBEN SOSA-BALDERAMA, also known as Oscar Armando Funez-Lopez, also known as Anulfo Mata, also known as Ruben Soza Balderama, also known as Arnulfo Mata-Martinez, also known as Ruben Balderama Sosa, also known as Carlos Humberto Martinez Lopez, also known as Luis Alonso Padilla Lopez, also known as Cesar Cruz Padilla, also known as Oscar Armando Funez Lopes, also known as Roberto Figueroa Lopez, also known as Enrique Carcamo, also known as Juan Ramon Bardales Cruz, also known as Oscar Ruben Balderrama Sosa, also known as Oscar A. Funez, also known as Ruben Soza-Balderama, also known as Oscar Armando Funez, also known as Ruben Sosa Balderama, also known as Ruben S. Balderama, also known as Oscar R. Balderama Soza, also known as Ruben Bardales-Cruz, also known as Cesar Cruz-Padilla, also known as Oscar A. Funez-Lopez, also known as Carlos H. Martinez-Lopez, also known as Oscar R. Balderrama-Sosa, also known as Juan R. Bardales-Cruz, also known as Cesar Cruz, also known as Roberto Figueroa-Lopez, also known as Oscar A. Funez-Lopes, also known as Robert F. Lopez, also known as Arnulfo Mata, also known as Luis A. Padilla-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12-CR-80-1 Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. Case: 12-20442 Document: 00512277947 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/18/2013 No. 12-20442 PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ruben SosaBalderama (Sosa) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sosa has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
