Washington v. Thaler, No. 12-20079 (5th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CasePetitioner, convicted of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon, applied for state habeas relief. The district court granted petitioner a certificate of appealability limited to the question of whether the trial court denied him a fair trial by not dismissing, sua sponte, Juror Number 12. The court concluded that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals' decision denying relief on petitioner's juror bias claim was not an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court. Petitioner had not cited any Supreme Court precedent establishing state trial courts have a duty to sua sponte dismiss a purportedly biased juror; no Supreme Court precedent established an obligation for a trial judge to dismiss a juror for bias where no party objected; and petitioner's claim was barred by Teague v. Lane. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.