Nina White-Robinson, et al v. Coventry II DDR/Trad, No. 12-11238 (5th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on January 2, 2014.
Download PDF
Case: 12-11238 Document: 00512487096 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/02/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 12-11238 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 2, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk In the Matter of: NINA WHITE-ROBINSON, --------------------------------------------- Debtor. NINA WHITE-ROBINSON; MPATANISHI TAYARI GARRETT, Appellants, versus COVENTRY II DDR/TRADEMARK MONTGOMERY FARM, L.P., Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:12-CV-259 Case: 12-11238 Document: 00512487096 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/02/2014 No. 12-11238 Before STEWART, Chief Judge, JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * In this bankruptcy matter, the debtor and her attorney challenge the district court s affirmance of three actions of the bankruptcy court: (1) the denial of the debtor s motion for contempt that had alleged the creditor s violation of the automatic stay; (2) the quashing of the debtor s subpoena and ordering debtor s attorney to pay the creditor $5,000 in sanctions; and (3) an order directing debtor s lawyer to pay the creditor $20,000 in sanctions. The district court explained its affirmance in a thorough and well-reasoned order dated November 13, 2012. We have reviewed the briefs and applicable law and have examined pertinent portions of the record. Out of an abundance of caution, we also entertained oral argument. There is no abuse of discretion or other reversible error. The judgment of the district court, affirming the various actions of the bankruptcy court, is AFFIRMED. Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
