USA v. Ricardo Ramirez-Lopez, No. 11-51018 (5th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 11-51018 Document: 00511964562 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 11-51018 Conference Calendar August 21, 2012 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RICARDO RAMIREZ-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:11-CR-1414-1 Before SMITH, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Ricardo Ramirez-Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramirez-Lopez has filed a response, but he has since been removed from the United States. We have reviewed counsel s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Ramirez-Lopez s response. We concur with counsel s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 11-51018 Document: 00511964562 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/21/2012 No. 11-51018 review. Accordingly, counsel s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5TH CIR. R. 42.2, and in part as moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir. 2007). 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
