United States v. Dominguez-Alvarado, No. 11-41304 (5th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed the district court's imposition of a three-year term of supervised release as part of his criminal sentence. Defendant objected to the reasonableness of the 46 months of imprisonment and then added, "[a]lso [I] object to the term of supervised release that's imposed as an upward departure," to which the district court responded, "[t]hank you, sir." The court held that, in light of the district court's particularized remark at sentencing, defendant's sentence did not constitute error, plain or otherwise, Accordingly, the sentence was affirmed and the case remanded for amendment of the written judgment to conform to the oral sentence.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.