United States v. St. Junius, et al., No. 11-20805 (5th Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseDefendants appealed their convictions stemming from their involvement in a health care fraud conspiracy. The court affirmed defendant St. Junius's conviction and sentence; affirmed defendant Ramos's conviction and sentence; affirmed defendant Spicer's conviction and sentence; but vacated Spicer's terms of supervised release and remanded for resentencing where the Government conceded that the district court's award of restitution exceeded the losses derived from the conduct for which Spicer was convicted. If the district court imposes restitution, it should be limited to the losses suffered as a result of the crimes for which Spicer was convicted.
The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on December 18, 2013.
The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on December 19, 2013.
The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on January 20, 2014.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.