William Lewis v. Brazoria Cty Sheriff's Office, et al, No. 11-20249 (5th Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 11-20249 Document: 00511653963 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/03/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED No. 11-20249 Summary Calendar November 3, 2011 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk WILLIAM SOLOMON LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. BRAZORIA COUNTY SHERIFF S OFFICE; SHERIFF CHARLES WAGNER; UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH, Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:10-CV-5014 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* William Solomon Lewis, Texas prisoner # 73998279, appeals from the dismissal of his civil rights action, which was brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion, if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). A timely notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement. Bowles v. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 11-20249 Document: 00511653963 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/03/2011 No. 11-20249 Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). A document may be construed as a notice of appeal only if it clearly evinces the party s intent to appeal. Mosley, 813 F.2d at 660 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). A pleading that both seeks to appeal and to obtain relief from the district court does not clearly evince an intent to appeal. See id. Both of the pleadings Lewis evidently intended to serve as notices of appeal also sought postjudgment relief from the district court. See Rosenzweig v. Azurix Corp., 332 F.3d 854, 864 (5th Cir. 2003). Those pleadings therefore did not clearly evince an intent to appeal, and were ineffective to serve as notices of appeal. See Mosley, 813 F.2d at 660. Because there is not effective notice of appeal, we lack jurisdiction over Lewis s appeal. See Bowles, 551 U.S. at 214. Lewis moves for leave to supplement his brief and to have his case placed under seal. Because we lack jurisdiction over the appeal, Lewis s motions are denied. APPEAL DISMISSED. MOTIONS DENIED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.