James Campbell v. Kenzie Bond, et al, No. 09-20362 (5th Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED December 23, 2009 No. 09-20362 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk JAMES ANTHONY CAMPBELL Plaintiff - Appellant v. KENZIE A. BOND, Lieutenant; KIMBERLY S. MOORE, Sergeant; DONNA K. CABEEN, Captain; PHILIP BRADLEY, CO3; MICHAEL D. BARNETT, Captain; KARI S. ANTHONY, CO3; MATTIE B. DOMINY, CO3; RICHARD A. GUNNELS, Major; WENDY MCKEE, Grievance Investigator; TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE - INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston 4:08-CV-1992 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* In this appeal, James Anthony Campbell, an inmate of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division ( TDCJ - * Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. No. 09-20362 CID), challenges the district court s dismissal of his complaint brought against a number of TDCJ - CID officials pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Campbell claimed in the district court that he was subjected to physical assault by TDCJ- CID officers, placed in an unsanitary and contaminated cell, and that TDCJ - CID officials were deliberately indifferent to his health and medical needs all in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Campbell also alleged retaliation, conspiracy, and a denial of due process. The District Court, in a thoughtful, well-reasoned, and thorough opinion, granted summary judgment to defendants on all claims and dismissed the suit. After carefully reviewing the record and briefs of the parties, and for the reasons assigned in the district court s Memorandum and Order on May 7, 2009, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Accordingly, Campbell s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. See Schwander v. Blackburn, 750 F.2d 494, 502 (5th Cir. 1985). AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.