Metro Riverboat, et al v. USA, et al, No. 07-30045 (5th Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 4, 2008 No. 07-30045 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk Metro Riverboat Associates Inc.; Norbert A. Simmons Plaintiffs-Appellants v. United States of America; Bally s Louisiana Inc.; Belle of Orleans LLC Defendants-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans 2:05-CV-3109 Before JONES, Chief Judge, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The district court did not err in denying appellant Metro s claim under 26 U.S.C. 6226 because no final partnership administrative adjustment was issued. The Internal Revenue Service made no adjustment to the partnership return. See Atlantic Rechfield Co. v. Department of Treasury, 1996 WL 788366 (D.D.C. 1996). The district court properly dismissed appellant Metro s ยง 6228 claim because no valid administrative-adjustment request (IRS Form 8082) was filed. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 07-30045 The Form 8082 filed was not completed in such a way as to constitute a valid Administrative Adjustment Request. No contrary argument is presented in appellants brief. AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.