USA v. Zepeda, No. 06-51504 (5th Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 4, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-51397 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERIC EDUARDO ZEPEDA-SOTO, also known as Eric Eduardo Zepeda, Defendant-Appellant. Consolidated w/ No. 06-51504 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERIC EDUARDO ZEPEDA, also known as Eric Ecuardo Zepeda, Defendant-Appellant. Consolidated w/ No. 06-51505 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERIC EDUARDO ZEPEDA, No. 06-51397 c/w No. 06-51504 and No. 06-51505 -2Defendant-Appellant. -------------------Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-743-ALL USDC No. 3:95-CR-26-ALL USDC No. 3:06-CR-1265-ALL -------------------Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgments in these Criminal Cases, the defendant raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgments of the district court are AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.