USA v. Anoman, No. 06-40774 (5th Cir. 2007)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 18, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-40774 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL SEAN ANOMAN, also known as Mike Jones, also known as Joseph James Anoman, Defendant-Appellant. -------------------Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-31-19 -------------------Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Michael Sean Anoman has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). response. Anoman has filed a Although Anoman asserts that his counsel provided ineffective assistance, the record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration of this issue on direct appeal. See United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir. 1987). Our independent review of the brief, Anoman s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. * Accordingly, Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 06-40774 -2counsel s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Anoman s request for the appointment of a new attorney is DENIED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
