USA v. Beauchamp, No. 06-30119 (5th Cir. 2006)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 5, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-30119 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DANA COLLETTE BEAUCHAMP, Defendant-Appellant. -------------------Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana No. 3:05-CR-19-1 -------------------- Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Dana Beauchamp has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Beauchamp has filed a response, which includes a claim of ineffective assistance. We do not reach that claim (about which we express no opinion), because the record has not been adequately developed to address it * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. on direct appeal. See United States v. Sanchez-Pena, 336 F.3d 431, 445-46 (5th Cir. 2003). Our independent review of the brief, the government s response, Beauchamp s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 42.2. All remaining motions are DENIED. See 5TH CIR. R.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
