USA v. Cobb, No. 04-51409 (5th Cir. 2006)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT January 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 04-51409 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v. DAWN MARIE COBB, KENNETH RYAN HAMANN Defendants - Appellants -------------------Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-141-2 -------------------Before KING, WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* A jury found that Dawn Marie Cobb and Kenneth Ryan Hamann, aided and abetted by each other, possessed equipment, chemicals, products and materials used to manufacture methamphetamine and opened, used, and maintained a place for the purpose of manufacturing, distributing, and using methamphetamine. A jury also found that Harmann attempted to manufacture methamphetamine. Both Cobb and Harmann challenge the sufficiency of the evidence supporting their convictions, having adequately preserved their * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 04-51409 -2challenge in district court. See United States v. Resio-Trejo, 45 F.3d 907, 911 n.6 (5th Cir. 1995) Viewing the evidence produced at trial in the light most favorable to the verdict, a reasonable trier of fact could have found that the evidence established beyond a reasonable doubt Cobb s and Hamann s guilt as to each of the charged offenses. See United States v. Villarreal, 324 F.3d 319, 322 (5th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
