Salazar-Regino, et al v. Trominski, et al, No. 03-41492 (5th Cir. 2007)
Annotate this Case
The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on February 15, 2007.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit February 13, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk _______________ m 03-41492 _______________ LAURA ESTELA SALAZAR-REGINO, Petitioner-Appellant, VERSUS E.M. TROMINSKI, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE; ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Respondents-Appellees. *************** TEODULO CANTU-DELGADILLO, Petitioner-Appellant, VERSUS E.M. TROMINSKI, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE; ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Respondents-Appellees. *************** DANIEL CARRIZALES-PEREZ, Petitioner-Appellant, VERSUS AARON CABRERA, ACTING DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, ACTING DIRECTOR HLG/DO; ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Respondents-Appellees. *************** MANUEL SANDOVAL-HERRERA, Petitioner-Appellant, AARON CABRERA, ACTING DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE; ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Respondents-Appellees. *************** 2 RAUL HERNANDEZ PANTOJA, Petitioner-Appellant, VERSUS ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES; CHARLES ARENDALE, ACTING DIRECTOR; Respondents-Appellees. *************** JOSE MARTIN OVIEDO-SIFUENTES, Petitioner-Appellant, VERSUS CHARLES ARENDALE, ACTING DIRECTOR; ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Respondents-Appellees. *************** 3 CESAR LUCIO, Petitioner-Appellant, CHARLES ARENDALE, ACTING DIRECTOR; ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Respondents-Appellees. *************** PRAXEDIS RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, VERSUS AARON CABRERA; ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Respondents-Appellees. *************** NOHEMI RANGEL-RIVERA, Petitioner-Appellant, VERSUS AARON CABRERA; ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Respondents-Appellees. 4 ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas ______________________________ On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States Before JOLLY, SMITH, and DEMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: In Salazar-Regino v. Moore, 127 S. Ct. 827 (2006), the Court granted the petition for writ of certiorari, and this court s opinion, Salazar-Regino v. Trominski, 415 F.3d 436 (5th Cir. 2005), was vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. ___, 127 S. Ct. 625 (2006). We have invited the parties to submit letters stating what action they wish this court to take on remand. We are in agreement with the joint request of the parties and therefore direct the following: As to petitioner Jose Oviedo-Sifuentes, no remand is warranted at this time. The Clerk is directed to issue a briefing schedule to address any remaining issues that were not addressed in our prior opinion. As to the other petitioners who have appealed under Fifth Circuit No. 03-41492, towit, Laura Salazar-Regino, Teodulo CantuDelgadillo, Daniel Carrizales-Perez, Manuel Sandoval-Herrera, Raul Hernandez Pantoja, Cesar Lucio, Praxedis Rodriguez, and Nohemi Rangel-Rivera, the judgment of the district court is VACATED, and this matter is REMANDED to the Board of Immigration Appeals for further consideration in light of Lopez. 5
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
