US v. Felipe Plasencia, No. 23-6466 (4th Cir. 2023)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-6466 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. FELIPE VALERIO PLASENCIA, a/k/a Phillip Valerio, a/k/a Felipe Valerio, a/k/a Jose Rodriguez, a/k/a Philip Santiogo, a/k/a Philip Walerio, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:03-cr-00400-CMH-1) Submitted: November 21, 2023 Decided: November 28, 2023 Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Felipe Valerio Plasencia, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Felipe Valerio Plasencia appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Plasencia, No. 1:03-cr-00400-CMH-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 25, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.