Steven Prentice v. Gregory Haynes, No. 23-6243 (4th Cir. 2023)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-6243 STEVEN DIXON PRENTICE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. GREGORY DELAND HAYNES; PHILLIP TOLMAN; DR. CLIFFORD CURTIS; ABHAY AGARWAL; DR. CHARLES A. LEWIS; EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR., Defendants - Appellees, and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; TERRI CATLETT; GEORGE BAIDEN; LORI A. WISHART, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:20-ct-03150-D) Submitted: September 28, 2023 Decided: October 3, 2023 Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Dixon Prentice, Appellant Pro Se. John David Kocher, SHUMAKER LOOP & KENDRICK, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina; Jeffrey D. Keister, MCANGUS GOUDELOCK & COURIE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina; Elizabeth Pharr McCullough, WALKER, ALLEN, GRICE, AMMONS, FOY, KLICK & MCCULLOUGH, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jennifer Dotson Maldonado, BATTEN LEE, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jonathan Edgar Hall, PARKER POE ADAMS & BERNSTEIN LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Bettina Jimille Roberts, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Steven Dixon Prentice, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Prentice v. Haynes, No. 5:20-ct-03150-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.