US v. Antedious Stowe, No. 23-6064 (4th Cir. 2023)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-6064 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTEDIOUS STOWE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:07-cr-00108-RJC-1) Submitted: April 20, 2023 Decided: April 25, 2023 Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antedious Stowe, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Antedious Stowe appeals the district court’s order granting in part his motion for a sentence reduction under § 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222. The court concluded that Stowe was eligible for relief and exercised its discretion to reduce his sentence, but not as low as requested. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining the extent of the sentence reduction. See Concepcion v. United States, 142 S. Ct. 2389, 240405 (2022) (stating standard). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. United States v. Stowe, No. 3:07-cr-00108-RJC-1 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 10, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.