Hazel Stoudemire, Jr. v. Sergeant Thomas, No. 22-6280 (4th Cir. 2022)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-6280 HAZEL STOUDEMIRE, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SERGEANT THOMAS, Prison Guard; LIEUTENANT PRIESTER; CAPTAIN LIVINGSTON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:21-cv-01230-JFA) Submitted: November 22, 2022 Decided: November 28, 2022 Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hazel Stoudemire, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, DAVIDSON, WREN & DEMASTERS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Hazel Stoudemire, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Stoudemire’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his state law claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Stoudemire v. Thomas, No. 2:21-cv01230-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 1, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.