Mithun Banerjee v. Bank of America, N.A., No. 22-2182 (4th Cir. 2023)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-2182 MITHUN BANERJEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; VIVIANA QUISHPE-NARVAEZ; THE CORPORATION TRUST, INCORPORATED; TESSA L. FREDERICK; JEFFREY P. REILLY; MILES & STOCKBRIDGE P. C., 100 Light Street, Baltimore Md 21202; ROSALYN TANG; STEPHEN J. MCAULIFFE, III; MILES & STOCKBRIDGE P. C., 11 N Washington St #700, Rockville, MD 20850, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:21-cv-03110-TDC) Submitted: October 31, 2023 Decided: November 2, 2023 Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mithun Banerjee, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mithun Banerjee appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Banerjee v. Bank of Am., N.A., No. 8:21-cv-03110-TDC (D. Md. Aug. 4, 2022, and Oct. 12, 2022). We also deny Banerjee’s motion to assign counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.