In re: Antonio Shropshire, No. 22-1475 (4th Cir. 2022)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1475 In re: ANTONIO SHROPSHIRE, a/k/a Brill, a/k/a B, a/k/a Tony, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:16-cr-00051-CCB-3) Submitted: May 27, 2022 Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Shropshire, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: June 8, 2022 PER CURIAM: Antonio Shropshire petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that on May 9, 2022, the district court denied relief on Shropshire’s motion. United States v. Shropshire, No. 1:16-cr-00051-CCB-3 (D. Md. May 9, 2022). Accordingly, because the district court has rendered its decision on Shropshire’s § 2255 motion, we deny his mandamus petition as moot. See Incumaa v. Ozmint, 507 F.3d 281, 286 (4th Cir. 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.