US v. Aquabeus Moore, No. 21-7379 (4th Cir. 2022)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-7379 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. AQUABEUS MOORE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:15-cr-00386-RMG-2) Submitted: April 28, 2022 Decided: June 3, 2022 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aquabeus Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Aquabeus Moore appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have reviewed the record on appeal and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Moore’s motion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (providing standard), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we deny Moore’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Moore, No. 2:15-cr-00386-RMG-2 (D.S.C. Sept. 13, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.