US v. Yonathan Melaku, No. 21-6122 (4th Cir. 2022)

Annotate this Case
Justia Opinion Summary

Defendant pleaded guilty to and was convicted of three felony offenses: (1) willfully injuring government property causing damage exceeding $1,000, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Section 1361; (2) using, carrying, and discharging a firearm during a crime of violence, namely, the Section 1361 offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Section 924(c); and (3) attempted injury to veterans’ memorials, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Section 1369. The district court sentenced Defendant to a term of 300 months’ imprisonment, which included a consecutive 120-month sentence for his conviction under Section 924(c).
 
At issue, on appeal, is whether a felony conviction under 18 U.S.C. Section 1361 for willfully injuring or committing depredation against government property, with damage exceeding $1,000, qualifies as a predicate crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. Section 924(c). The Fourth Circuit concluded that it does not because this property offense can be committed in a non-violent manner without “the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another.” 18 U.S.C. Section 924(c)(3)(A). Because the district court erred in reaching a contrary conclusion, the court reversed the court’s judgment and remanded.
 
The court explained, that the least culpable felony under Section 1361 effectively constitutes intentional vandalism of government property. Because this conduct does not require the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force, the court held that a felony offense under Section 1361 does not qualify categorically as a predicate “crime of violence” defined by Section 924(c)(3)(A).

The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on July 27, 2022.

Primary Holding

The Fourth Circuit reversed the district court’s judgment denying Defendant’s motion filed under Section 2255. THe court remanded the case to the district court with instructions to vacate Defendant’s conviction under Section 924(c) and resentence Defendant on the remaining two charges.


Disclaimer: Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.