Bro Hesed-El v. County of Buncombe, No. 21-1869 (4th Cir. 2022)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1869 BRO T. HESED-EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE, in its official capacity, Defendant - Appellee, and JOHN DOE, in his individual capacity; ROBIN BRYSON, Licensed Clinical Social Worker, in her official capacity; MISSION HOSPITALS, INCORPORATED, in its official capacity, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:19-cv-00285-MR-WCM) Submitted: September 21, 2022 Decided: November 7, 2022 Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bro T. Hesed-El, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis William Euler, BUNCOMBE COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Bro T. Hesed-El appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Hesed-El’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hesed-El’s motions for appointment of counsel and to strike Appellee’s informal response brief, and we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
