Damian Stinnie v. Richard Holcomb, No. 21-1756 (4th Cir. 2022)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on June 27, 2022.
Download PDF
FILED: August 9, 2022 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ___________________ No. 21-1756 (3:16-cv-00044-NKM-JCH) ___________________ DAMIAN STINNIE; MELISSA ADAMS; ADRAINNE JOHNSON; WILLIEST BANDY; BRIANNA MORGAN, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated Plaintiffs - Appellants v. RICHARD D. HOLCOMB, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles Defendant - Appellee -----------------------------AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF VIRGINIA, ET AL Amicus Supporting Appellant INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE Amicus Supporting Rehearing Petition ___________________ ORDER ___________________ A majority of judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in a requested poll of the court to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that rehearing en banc is granted. The parties and any amici curiae shall file 16 additional paper copies of their briefs and appendices previously filed in this case within 10 days. Copies of amici briefs relating to a petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc are not required. The parties may move, or the court may sua sponte order, the filing of supplemental en banc briefs pursuant to Local Rule 35(d). For the Court /s/ Patricia S. Connor, Clerk
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
