Daniel Felix v. Doug Doughtie, No. 21-1740 (4th Cir. 2022)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1740 DANIEL FELIX, Homeless Cats of Hatteras Island, NC, Non-Property Animals of Hatteras Island, NC, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DOUG DOUGHTIE, Sheriff, in his official and individual capacity; DONAVAN RUTH; DARE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA; ROBERT OUTTEN, Dare County Attorney, in his official and individual capacity; ROBERT WOODARD, Dare County Board of Commissioner Chairman, in his official capacity and individual capacity; WALLY OVERMAN, Dare County Board of Commissioner Vice Chairman, in his official capacity and individual capacity; ROB ROSS, Dare County Board of Commissioner, in his official capacity and individual capacity; STEVE HOUSE, Dare County Board of Commissioner, in his official capacity and individual capacity; JIM TOBIN, Dare County Board of Commissioner, in his official capacity and individual capacity; DANNY COUCH, Dare County Board of Commissioner in his official capacity and individual capacity; ERVIN BATEMAN, Dare County Board of Commissioner, in his official capacity and individual capacity; ANDREW WOMBLE, District Attorney, in his official capacity and individual capacity; JEFF CRUDEN, District Attorney, in his official capacity and individual capacity; JENNIFER BLAND, District Attorney, in her official capacity and individual capacity; JOSHUA STEIN, NC Attorney General, in his official capacity and individual capacity; ROY COOPER, NC Governor, in his official capacity and individual capacity; GOVERNOR MCCRORY, NC Governor, in his official capacity and individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (2:21-cv-00007-FL) Submitted: June 30, 2022 Decided: July 19, 2022 Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel Felix, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Daniel Felix appeals the district court’s order dismissing in part without prejudice and dismissing in part with prejudice his amended civil action, denying as moot his motion seeking emergency injunctive relief, and denying his motions for discovery. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Felix v. Doughtie, No. 2:21-cv-00007-FL (E.D.N.C. June 8, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
