Matthew Bryson v. Compucom Systems, Inc., No. 21-1674 (4th Cir. 2022)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1674 MATTHEW BRYSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMPUCOM SYSTEMS, INC.; DOES 1 THROUGH 10, inclusive; ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES 1 THROUGH 10, inclusive, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:19-cv-01121-CCE-JEP) Submitted: September 30, 2022 Decided: November 4, 2022 Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Matthew Bryson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Douglas Dellinger, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Matthew Bryson appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant and denying Bryson’s postjudgment motion in his employment discrimination action. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Bryson v. CompuCom Sys., Inc., No. 1:19-cv-01121-CCE-JEP (M.D.N.C. June 15, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED Bryson has not challenged in his informal brief the district court’s order denying his postjudgment motion to amend. As such, he has forfeited review of the order. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014). * 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.