Clara Brockington v. Lowe's Home Improvement, No. 21-1016 (4th Cir. 2021)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1016 CLARA LEWIS BROCKINGTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LOWE’S HOME IMPROVEMENT; PURVIS WALKER; LOWE’S CORPORATE OFFICE; MARVIN ELLISON; ROBERT A. NIBLOCK; MR. BELTON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (4:20-cv-03157-RBH) Submitted: April 27, 2021 Before KEENAN, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clara Lewis Brockington, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: May 3, 2021 PER CURIAM: Clara Lewis Brockington appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brockington v. Lowe’s Home Improvement, No. 4:20-cv-03157-RBH (D.S.C. Nov. 30, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED Although the district court dismissed Brockington’s complaint without prejudice, we conclude that the district court’s order is appealable. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 605, 610-11 (4th Cir. 2020), cert. denied, No. 20-759, 2021 WL 666419 (U.S. Feb. 22, 2021). * 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.