US v. Michael Jacobs, No. 20-7728 (4th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-7728 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL JACOBS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-cr-00364-D-1) Submitted: April 27, 2021 Decided: May 5, 2021 Before AGEE, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua L. Rogers, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In this motion for compassionate release brought by Michael Jacobs, the district court entered an order denying the motion without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Jacobs noted his appeal from the order dismissing his motion without prejudice and, on appeal, sought consideration of his motion on the merits. However, subsequently, the district court granted Jacobs reconsideration, assumed that administrative remedies were exhausted, and denied the motion on the merits. Because Jacobs has already received the relief he seeks on appeal, this appeal is now moot. See Incumaa v. Ozmint, 507 F. 3d 281, 286 (4th Cir. 2007) (setting forth principles of appellate mootness). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
