US v. Shirley Ingram, No. 20-7629 (4th Cir. 2021)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-7629 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SHIRLEY INGRAM, a/k/a Raheem, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:10-cr-00069-FDW-1) Submitted: March 31, 2021 Decided: April 20, 2021 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Shirley Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Shirley Ingram appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Ingram, No. 3:10-cr-00069-FDW-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 14, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.