Anthony Wright v. Lt. Oxendine, No. 20-7411 (4th Cir. 2020)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-7411 ANTHONY WRIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LT. OXENDINE; CHAPLAIN HOVIS; FRANKLIN GRAHAM; CLAYTON BREWER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-ct-03146-D) Submitted: December 17, 2020 Decided: December 22, 2020 Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony Wright appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing without prejudice Wright’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint on the ground that Wright failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing his complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Ross v. Blake, 136 S Ct. 1850, 1854-55 (2016) (stating that inmate must exhaust available administrative remedies before filing suit challenging prison conditions). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wright v. Oxendine, No. 5:18-ct-03146-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 9, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.