US v. Stacey Jenkins, No. 20-7191 (4th Cir. 2021)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-7191 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. STACEY GERAD JENKINS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (4:16-cr-00041-RAJ-RJK-2) Submitted: February 24, 2021 Before KEENAN, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stacey Gerad Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: March 10, 2021 PER CURIAM: Stacey Gerad Jenkins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v. Chambliss, 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jenkins, No. 4:16-cr-00041-RAJ-RJK-2 (E.D. Va. July 31, 2020). We deny Jenkins’ request for appellate counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.