US v. Hakim Rashid, No. 20-7038 (4th Cir. 2021)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-7038 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HAKIM ABDULAH RASHID, a/k/a Rodney Buchanan, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (4:10-cr-00941-RBH-1) Submitted: February 19, 2021 Decided: February 25, 2021 Before KING, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hakim Abdulah Rashid, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Hakim Abdulah Rashid appeals the district court’s order denying, without prejudice, * Rashid’s motion for compassionate release, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Rashid, No. 4:10-cr-00941-RBH-1 (D.S.C. June 26, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Although the district court denied the motion without prejudice, we have jurisdiction over this appeal. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 605, 615 (4th Cir. 2020). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.