Supreme Ackbar v. Scott Lewis, No. 20-6358 (4th Cir. 2020)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-6358 SUPREME RAHEEM ACKBAR, a/k/a Ronald Gary, Plaintiff - Appellant, and ROBERT L. MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT LEWIS; C. HINDENBURG; OFFICER JACOBS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (4:19-cv-02045-RMG) Submitted: August 31, 2020 Decided: November 5, 2020 Before KEENAN, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Supreme Raheem Ackbar, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Supreme Raheem Ackbar appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Ackbar’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ackbar v. Lewis, No. 4:19-cv-02045-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 4, 2020). We deny Ackbar’s motion to vacate the district court’s opinion and judgment and his supplemental motion to vacate the district court’s opinion and judgment and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.