James Freeman v. SAIC, No. 20-2371 (4th Cir. 2022)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-2371 JAMES FREEMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a/k/a SAIC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:19-cv-01502-LMB-MSN) Submitted: November 17, 2022 Decided: November 22, 2022 Before KING, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. ON BRIEF: Christopher E. Brown, THE BROWN FIRM PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Kimberley Lunetta, Miami, Florida, Matthew J. Sharbaugh, Zachary S. Stinson, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James Freeman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for partial summary judgment and granting Defendant summary judgment on Freeman’s discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Freeman v. Sci. Applications Int’l Corp., No. 1:19-cv-01502-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.