In re: Michael Smith, No. 20-2285 (4th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-2285 In re: MICHAEL R. SMITH, a/k/a Smitty, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:12-cr-00733-JFA-1) Submitted: February 23, 2021 Decided: February 25, 2021 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael R. Smith, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael R. Smith petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to vacate the criminal judgment. We conclude that Smith is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy-Brown, LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear and indisputable right to the relief sought and has no other adequate means to obtain the relief he desires. Murphy-Brown, 907 F.3d at 795. The relief sought by Smith is not available by way of mandamus because he has not demonstrated an indisputable right to relief or that moving for relief in the district court would be inadequate. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
