Mario Dagulo v. US, No. 20-1670 (4th Cir. 2020)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1670 MARIO RANESES DAGULO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:18-cv-00366-RGD-LRL) Submitted: November 17, 2020 Decided: November 19, 2020 Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mario Raneses Dagulo, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mario Raneses Dagulo appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint in which he alleged medical malpractice and violations of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, and the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dagulo v. United States, No. 2:18-cv-00366-RGD-LRL (E.D. Va. Apr. 17, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.