Nancy Carlin v. Navient Solutions, LLC, No. 20-1300 (4th Cir. 2021)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1300 NANCY CARLIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC, f/k/a Navient Solutions, Inc., f/k/a Sallie Mae, Incorporated, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00491-LMB-TCB) Submitted: November 23, 2021 Decided: November 29, 2021 Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benjamin J. Miller, THE HIGGINS FIRM, PLLC, Nashville, Tennessee; William L. Downing, CONSUMER LEGAL SOLUTIONS, PC, Suffolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael A. Hass, McLean, Virginia, Lisa M. Simonetti, GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Nancy Carlin appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Navient Solutions, LLC, in her action alleging that Navient violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(A). We have reviewed the record included on appeal as well as the parties’ briefs and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Carlin v. Navient Sols., LLC, No. 1:19-cv-00491-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Feb. 11, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.