Andre King v. McFadden, No. 19-6955 (4th Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6955 ANDRE KING, Petitioner - Appellant, v. MCFADDEN, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00091-JMC) Submitted: December 19, 2019 Decided: December 23, 2019 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre King, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Andre King appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to extend or reopen the period to note an appeal from the order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. King v. McFadden, No. 1:14-cv-00091-MC (D.S.C. May 31, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.