William Dickey v. SCDC, No. 19-6308 (4th Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6308 WILLIAM DEVON DICKEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCDC; WARDEN COHEN; NURSE WITE; OFFICER HARRIS; DOCTOR LEMON; NURSE GRIMES; NURSE SIMMONS; LIEUTENANT MAZE; LIEUTENANT BRYANT; SERGEANT DEVIN WILLIAMS; DOCTOR ROBERTS, Optical Lab, Defendants - Appellees, and EYE CLINIC, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (9:17-cv-02194-DCC) Submitted: May 23, 2019 Decided: May 29, 2019 Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Devon Dickey, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Charles Tanner, MICHAEL C. TANNER LAW OFFICE, Bamberg, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: William Devon Dickey appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dickey v. SCDC, No. 9:17-cv-02194-DCC (D.S.C. Feb. 13, 2019). We deny Dickey’s motions for appointment of counsel and motion to strike. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.