Charles Campbell v. Hollie Bennett, No. 19-2149 (4th Cir. 2020)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2149 CHARLES R. CAMPBELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MS. HOLLIE S. BENNETT; DR. KAREN K. SHELTON; HONORABLE TONY M. JONES; MS. CATHERINE A. STONE; MR. CHARLTON B. HALL; MS. EMILY H. FARR; MR. DEAN GRIGG; MS. CHRISTA T. BELL; MR. DAVID B. LOVE; BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, South Carolina Dept. of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation; MS. SHIRLEY A. VICKERY; SOUTH CAROLINA BAR ASSOCIATION; SOUTH CAROLINA BAR BOARD OF GOVERNORS; MR. M. DAWES COOKE, JR.; MS. BEVERLY A. CARROLL; DR. J. PATRICK GOLDSMITH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (0:19-cv-00973-JFA) Submitted: April 14, 2020 Decided: April 16, 2020 Before WILKINSON, QUATTLEBAUM, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles R. Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Charles R. Campbell appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Campbell’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Campbell v. Bennett, No. 0:19-cv-00973-JFA (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.