Diane Groth v. Paul Nakasone, No. 19-1843 (4th Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1843 DIANE MARIE GROTH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PAUL M. NAKASONE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:16-cv-02569-JKB) Submitted: December 19, 2019 Decided: December 23, 2019 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Diane Marie Groth, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Diane Marie Groth appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant summary judgment on Groth’s retaliation, age and gender discrimination, and harassment claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2019). We have reviewed the record in conjunction with the arguments raised on appeal and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Groth v. Nakasone, No. 1:16-cv-02569-JKB (D. Md. filed July 18, 2019 & entered July 19, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.