Napier Fuller v. Rebecca Holt, No. 19-1110 (4th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1110 NAPIER SANDFORD FULLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. REBECCA W. HOLT, in her official capacity as employee of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts; RICHARD A. BADDOUR, in his official capacity as employee of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts; JAMES C. STANFORD, in his official capacity as employee of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts; JAMES T. BRYAN III, in his official capacity as employee of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts; SAMANTHA HYATT CABE, in her official capacity as employee of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts; CATHERINE C. STEVENS, in her official capacity as employee of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts, Defendants – Appellees. No. 19-1306 NAPIER SANDFORD FULLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. REBECCA W. HOLT, in her official capacity as employee of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts; RICHARD A. BADDOUR, in his official capacity as employee of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts; JAMES C. STANFORD, in his official capacity as employee of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts; JAMES T. BRYAN, III, in his official capacity as employee of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts; SAMANTHA HYATT CABE, in her official capacity as employee of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts; CATHERINE C. STEVENS, in her official capacity as employee of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (7:18-cv-00059-FL) Submitted: June 20, 2019 Decided: June 24, 2019 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Napier Sandford Fuller, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Woodruff Sawchak, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Napier Sandford Fuller appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint that alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101 to 12213 (West 2013 & Supp. 2018), and the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701-796l (West 2018), and its subsequent orders denying his motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and motion for a temporary restraining order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fuller v. Holt, No. 7:18-cv-00059-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 21, 2018, Jan. 2, 2019, Feb. 25, 2019). We grant Fuller’s motion to withdraw and replace his informal brief and deny his motion for summary disposition and request for injunctive relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
