US v. Jack Vance, No. 18-7304 (4th Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-7304 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JACK EARL VANCE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (2:05-cr-00043-JPB-1) Submitted: April 18, 2019 Decided: April 22, 2019 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jack Earl Vance, Appellant Pro Se. Traci Michelle Cook, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jack Earl Vance appeals the district court’s omnibus order denying the various postjudgment motions Vance filed seeking, among other relief, the production of evidence presented in his federal criminal proceedings and trial transcripts. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Vance, No. 2:05-cr-00043-JPB-1 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 9, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.