William Dixon v. Kristi Cortez, No. 18-6486 (4th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on September 19, 2018.
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6486 WILLIAM K. DIXON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KRISTI CORTEZ, RN; KRISTA BILAK, RNP; MULUGETA AKAL, M.D.; WARDEN FRANK BISHOP, JR., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:17-cv-00503-TDC) Submitted: April 22, 2019 Decided: May 9, 2019 Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William K. Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Conrad Meister, Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale Park, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William K. Dixon appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Dixon v. Cortez, No. 8:17-cv-00503-TDC (D. Md. Mar. 22, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
