US v. Samuel Crook, No. 18-6484 (4th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6484 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SAMUEL PAUL CROOK, Defendant - Appellant. No. 18-6485 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SAMUEL PAUL CROOK, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1; 3:04-cr-00059-MOC-DSC-1) Submitted: August 16, 2018 Decided: August 21, 2018 Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Paul Crook, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Samuel Paul Crook appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se motion to grant a new trial and/or dismiss all federal charges. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Crook, Nos. 3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1, 3:04-cr-00059-MOCDSC-1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2018). We deny Crook’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
