Tamara Stanfield v. Richard Graham, No. 18-6427 (4th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6427 TAMARA STANFIELD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICHARD GRAHAM, Warden; BRADLEY BUTLER, Security Chief; DAYENA CORCORAN, Commissioner of Correction; STEVEN BEEMAN, Sergeant; JEFFREY SHIMKO, Lieutenant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (8:16-cv-04149-GLR) Submitted: July 26, 2018 Decided: July 31, 2018 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tamara Stanfield, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Tamara Stanfield appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stanfield v. Graham, No. 8:16-cv-04149-GLR (D. Md. filed Mar. 27, 2018 & entered Mar. 28, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.