Supreme Ackbar v. William R. Byers, Jr., No. 18-6272 (4th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6272 SUPREME RAHEEM ACKBAR, a/k/a Ronald Gary, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAM R. BYERS, JR., Commissioner of the South Carolina Department of Corrections; WARDEN JOSEPH MCFADDEN; LIEUTENANT EUGENE SKIPPER; LIEUTENANT COOPER; SERGEANT WILSON, Defendants - Appellees, and LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; SCDC; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (4:17-cv-01019-RMG) Submitted: June 20, 2018 Decided: June 27, 2018 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Supreme Raheem Ackbar, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael DeAntonio, Christopher Thomas Dorsel, SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Supreme Raheem Ackbar appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting defendants’ motion to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ackbar v. Byers, No. 4:17-cv-01019-RMG (D.S.C. Mar. 6, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.