In re: Jermaine Tart, No. 18-2197 (4th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2197 In re: JERMAINE ANTWAN TART, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:17-ct-03207-D) Submitted: March 28, 2019 Decided: April 10, 2019 Before KEENAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DUNCAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jermaine Antwan Tart, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jermaine Antwan Tart petitions this court for a writ of mandamus compelling North Carolina state prison officials to turn over legal documents and shoes allegedly stolen from Tart. We deny the petition. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re Murphy-Brown, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Moreover, this court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials. Gurley v. Superior Ct. of Mecklenburg Cty., 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969). Tart seeks an order directing action by state officials, but the relief he seeks is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
