Victor Jones, Jr. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 18-2168 (4th Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2168 VICTOR O. JONES, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.; GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for Ginnie Mae Remic Trust 2006-026; JOHN DOES 1-100, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (6:17-cv-02486-BHH) Submitted: May 28, 2019 Decided: May 31, 2019 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor O. Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Todd Carroll, Columbia, South Carolina, Shelton Sterling Laney, III, WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Victor O. Jones, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Jones’ complaint with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman * doctrine. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 6:17-cv02486-BHH (D.S.C. Sept. 4, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * D.C. Ct. of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Tr. Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923). 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.