Wanda Letang v. Robert Wilkie, Jr., No. 18-2166 (4th Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2166 WANDA LETANG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROBERT L. WILKIE, JR.; DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS AGENCY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:18-cv-00095-GMG) Submitted: March 1, 2019 Decided: March 6, 2019 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and DIAZ and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wanda Letang, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Wanda Letang seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing her complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). In this case, Letang could amend her complaint to allege a prima facie case of discrimination and establish a proper basis for federal jurisdiction. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623 (4th Cir. 2015). Thus, the order Letang seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny the motions to remand and to file a copy of a motion submitted to an administrative agency, and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We remand to the district court with instructions to allow Letang to file an amended complaint if she so chooses. See id. at 630. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED AND REMANDED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.